Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:02:18 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken <joshua.lokken@gmail.com> To: Duane Winner <dwinner-lists@att.net> Cc: FreeBSD mailinglist <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE Message-ID: <bc5b638505010712022ca0fb6a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <41DEE9DE.4060408@att.net> References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> <41DEAD57.2070706@scii.nl> <41DEAF96.9060400@scii.nl> <41DEC203.4010409@att.net> <41DED53F.3030201@xs4all.nl> <41DEE9DE.4060408@att.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:58:22 -0500, Duane Winner <dwinner-lists@att.net> wrote: > > > gustaaf wijnands wrote: > > >> Just a couple more questions: > >> If I keep my ports tree cvsup'd every day, I'm going to have: > >> openoffice-1.1.3 < needs updating (port has 1.1.3_1) > >> > >> We generally do a "portupgrade -a" to upgrade ports unless > >> /usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the openoffice > >> discrepency since a portupgrade -a will always try build it again and > >> end up failing? > >> > > > > portupgrade -a -x openoffice-1.1.3 ?? > > > > I must be losing it. I looked at the man page twice and didn't see that > -x switch. Must be Friday or something. > Thanks -- that does it. > > -DW However, please note the response that mentions using HOLD_PKG in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf; that'll save you from having to use -x at all. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bc5b638505010712022ca0fb6a>