Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 00:41:47 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: mark thompson <thompson@squirrel.tgsoft.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.com Subject: Re: cap60 port Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970331003706.397D-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <19970331011014.2546.qmail@squirrel.tgsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31 Mar 1997, mark thompson wrote: > From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> > > On Fri, 28 Mar 1997, mark thompson wrote: > > > It does not appear that the cap60 port uses the kernel appletalk. Is > > this because nobody has updated the port, or because it doesn't work? > > I need to verify this, but I believe the kernel appletalk is only Phase 1, > not the more common Phase 2. This is the sense I get from netatalk, which > is what the kernel hook is for. > > Please correct me if I am wrong tho. I know that cap can use this port. > > Ah. thanks. It may also be that people have gone to netatalk. I just > stumbled over it myself while looking for cap updates. I just re-ran it today and it does do phase 2. I've been generally happier with netatalk, it's a few times faster than CAP. I don't like that it doesn't have two-way password encryption and I don't know if it does native volumes though, guess I should go digging a bit. I suggest trying them both and using what you like best. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.94.970331003706.397D-100000>