Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 23:51:03 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD shines..[Fwd: Re: semaphore speed] Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971103234707.17567C-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199711040736.CAA00454@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, John S. Dyson wrote: > Julian Elischer said: > > Linux 2.1.57 on a P120 > > fcntl: 21.3006 secs > > ipc: 93.9982 secs > > > > FreeBSD 2.2.2 on a 200MHz pentium should read PPro200 > > fcntl: 3.16579 secs > > ipc: 2.63504 secs > > > > Linux 2.0.30 on a PPro200 > > fcntl: 12.2177 secs > > ipc: 50.4559 secs > > > > My results with FBSD-current on PPro200 > > UP kernel: > fcntl: 10.735 secs > ipc: 9.17823 secs > > SMP kernel: > fcntl: 17.8355 secs > ipc: 9.10841 secs > > It appears that the 200MHz Pentium results are for a really fast > machine :-). Is there a chance that there was an error in the > Pentium test? Or are the results correct? (Sometimes Pentiums > are paradoxically faster than PPro's.) I just want to make sure > that people aren't misinformed that FreeBSD is *that* much faster > than Linux.. Actually it was a 200MHz PPro. the difference is that it was 2.2.2 We seem to have slowed it down by a factor of 3 :( I saw the test run several times.. it really did return in 3 seconds. > > John >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.971103234707.17567C-100000>