Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 14:40:49 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, smp@csn.net, opsys@mail.webspan.net, jak@cetlink.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE? Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980303143444.3809A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199803030519.WAA26387@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 Mar 1998, Nate Williams wrote: > > I just found out that ODI's ObjectStore uses Transitive Closure > > calculations to manage objects. They've got one of the fastest object db > > implementations around for this and other reasons. > > Bwah, hah, hah, hah, hah. (Wiping tears from my eyes..) > > You've *GOT* to be kidding, right? ObjectStore is fast for a ObjectDB, > but it's *darn* slow as compared to a relational DB, like Oracle and/or > Informix. > > (We use their Java engine in our product, but speedy it ain't. And the > locking in ObjectStore is useless at best. At least their payware Java > DB has the ability to have more than one 'session' open on a DB at a > time.) You're looking at the PSE which is completely different. You're playing with a one user toy, a nice toy but still a toy. ODI's ObjectStore is faster than Oracle, Sybase, or Informix. Much faster. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.980303143444.3809A-100000>