Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:15:18 -0700
From:      "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com>
To:        "Jeff Blank" <jb000003@mr-happy.com>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: 8.0-BETA3/IPv6: route: bad keyword: cloning
Message-ID:  <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4305361EBE@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090904173716.GA2278@mr-happy.com>
References:  <20090904173716.GA2278@mr-happy.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>=20
> Upon booting an 8.0-BETA3 system with IPv6 enabled, I saw this in the
> console boot output:
>=20
> route: bad keyword: cloning
> usage: route [-dnqtv] command [[modifiers] args]
>=20
> This looks like it's from line 1062/1063 of /etc/network.subr
> v1.195.2.4.
>=20
> This system is not an IPv6 router, so do I particularly need
> $ipv6_default_interface set in rc.conf?
>=20
> Is there a situation where -cloning (still referenced in the man page)
> is a valid option to route (in inet6 context at least)?  If no, should
> I file a PR?  (I searched GNATS but didn't find anything matching
> this.)
>=20

	Route cloning is obsolete. Please report issues concerning
	8.0 to freebsd-current@freebsd.org.

	Thanks,

	-- Qing




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4305361EBE>