Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:36:43 +0300 From: Artyom Mirgorodskiy <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623. Message-ID: <2271040.usaorIa3D6@home.alkar.net> In-Reply-To: <51702dc6.87ee440a.57aa.327e@mx.google.com> References: <51702dc6.87ee440a.57aa.327e@mx.google.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes On Thursday 18 April 2013 10:30:33 Adrian Chadd wrote: On head? Adrian Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T -------------------- Artyom MirgorodskiyOn Apr 18, 2013 10:06 AM, <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com> wrote: I tried to check out revision 245031 (only sys/dev/ath) and got a working WiFi. I'll try to find a broken revision. On Thursday 18 April 2013 11:37:17 John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? > > Only that this means absolutely nothing? These are the values the BIOS wrote > into the registers which we use as hints about whether or not ACPI lies about > which interrupts are used when APIC is disabled. The actually useful message > shows the same interrupts used in both cases: > > > HEAD: > > > > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18 > > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci10 > > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60 > > > > versus > > > > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18 > > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci10 > > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60 > > -- Artyom Mirgorodskiy -- Artyom Mirgorodskiy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2271040.usaorIa3D6>