Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:39:16 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Marcin Cieslak <saper@saper.info>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IPv6 not responding on some aliases (recent 8-stable)
Message-ID:  <slrnjf75bk.i0d.saper@saper.info>
References:  <slrnjf53o4.2d1.saper@saper.info> <F2005BBF-1808-4E63-B5F3-71361A95008A@lists.zabbadoz.net> <slrnjf6s3g.i0d.saper@saper.info> <C72FCBE6-AC3B-486B-B487-DA1FDA1F4474@lists.zabbadoz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
>> I initially thought it's a transport layer issue, since previously (before
>> I changed configuration) 30%-50% SSH connection attempts succeeded
>> (but prefix was wrong on the "primary" IPv6 address :1000).
>> Now I get no packets on receiving side at all for those "broken" IPv6 addresses.
>
> Talk to ywhomever is providing in front of you to
> 1) either relax nd6 table limits or
> 2) to route a /64 to your host to only have 1 entry in the neighbour table.
>
> That's most likely the problem given my crystal ball and experience.

Thank you for insightful analysis! 
Seems like this provider has some significant IPv6 takeup, which is
good news - sorry for hassle, but problems started after upgrade. 

I'll talk to my upstream then, thanks!

//Marcin




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnjf75bk.i0d.saper>