Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 21:41:50 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> Cc: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>, Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Iozone: local vs nfs drives Message-ID: <199610180441.VAA23850@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Oct 1996 00:22:11 EDT." <Pine.NEB.3.95.961018002044.6698D-100000@quagmire.ki.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> No, it doesn't, but I think it might bring up another point... >is there a way of having tagged-command queueing enabled by default? If >there is the potential to see such a boost in performance as has been >reported, at least in the 'write' department...is there a disadvantage >to it that hasn't been brought up? It will be enabled by default as soon as we have a system in place to allow quirk entries for devices that botch tags. In the SCSI code on the 'SCSI' branch, tagged queueing is handled by the generic SCSI layer which allows for the addition of just such a quirk trivially. In short, this will happen... most likely in current before another month has passed. > >Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net >Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org > -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610180441.VAA23850>