Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:26:23 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, arch@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New "timeout" api, to replace callout Message-ID: <2067.1199316383@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:23:31 %2B0100." <477C1CF3.6070301@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <477C1CF3.6070301@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann writes: >I fear we have to go for the latter. Getting a non-sleeping callout >drain seems to be non-trivial. There is a crucial difference between "non-sleeping" and "not sleeping on my lock" that you should be very careful about in this context. Which is your requirement ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2067.1199316383>