Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:50:32 +0100
From:      Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com>
To:        Pawel Worach <pawel.worach@telia.com>
Cc:        'John Baldwin' <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) process lock
Message-ID:  <20030415105032.GB93652@survey.codeburst.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030414223318.GA75035@survey.codeburst.net>
References:  <XFMail.20030414155909.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <000201c302c1$e0d1dee0$1401a8c0@corona> <20030414223318.GA75035@survey.codeburst.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:33:18PM +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:10:21PM +0200, Pawel Worach wrote:
> > Yes they are, it's been like this for about a week or so
> > the latest working kernel i have is:
> > FreeBSD darkstar 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Apr  8 02:59:24
> > CEST 2003     root@darkstar:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DARKSTAR  i386
> > 
> 
> I have the same problem, and the same last working date.
> 
> I'm building a kernel from the 9th at the moment to try and pinpoint
> exactly when this broke.

I have a working kernel from the 11th and a broken kernel from the 12th.
I'll do some more tracking down this evening but something definitely
broke in that 24 hours.

I think someone else reported that SCHED_4BSD is still working ok, in
which case it must be one of the commits to sched_ule.c on that day, and
there look to be some patches that might cause this but I've not managed
to identify which one yet, or even confirmed that SCHED_4BSD is actually
working (needed sleep).

More tonight unless someone fixes it in the meantime :-)

Paul.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030415105032.GB93652>