Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:41:23 +0100 From: Albert Shih <shih@math.jussieu.fr> To: "Loren M. Lang" <lorenl@alzatex.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw or pf Message-ID: <20050304124123.GA12225@math.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20050303210753.GM30896@alzatex.com> References: <20050301224201.GC7469@math.jussieu.fr> <20050302090009.R23556@mail.rot-1.de> <20050302115706.GL15179@math.jussieu.fr> <20050303210753.GM30896@alzatex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 03/03/2005 =E0 13:07:53-0800, Loren M. Lang a =E9crit > > Well it's not de syntaxes, I always use packet filter system (sometime = on > > hardware like Foundry/Cisco) where the rule is : First match first use.= And > > the pf use entire rules is very strange for me (I known I can use ?quic= k? > > but....well it's not the philosophy I think). >=20 > I like first match better too, but I think pf is sufficiently better > that I just use it with quick over ipfw. >=20 Better on what ? I really like to known. And my question is not a troll or something like that. Regards -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. Heure local/Local time: Fri Mar 4 13:40:29 CET 2005
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050304124123.GA12225>