Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:45:31 -0500
From:      John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Daniel Gerzo <danger@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "B. Cook" <bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org>
Subject:   Re: looks like success
Message-ID:  <200803031245.31936.lists@jnielsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <256113233.20080302095043@rulez.sk>
References:  <740F46FB-B946-408F-8404-7C25E6273F43@poughkeepsieschools.org> <256113233.20080302095043@rulez.sk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 02 March 2008 03:50:43 am Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> Hello B.,
>
> Thursday, February 28, 2008, 9:27:03 PM, you wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > make delete-old (took a long time to do by hand)
> > and make delete-old-libs (went rather quickly)
>
> if you really want to delete all things:
>
> # yes | make delete-old

While I've seen this suggestion before (and it's a very unix-y way to do 
it), the "canonical" method (from build(7)) is to run
 make -DBATCH_DELETE_OLD_FILES delete-old

What I'd like to see (although I realize this isn't the correct forum..) 
is a make target that produces a list of files that _would_ be deleted, 
which the admin could then review and approve all or remove individual 
files to be preserved. But until I turn this into a useful PR or a nice 
request on a different list just consider it a rant. :)

JN



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200803031245.31936.lists>