Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:58:38 +0300 From: Artyom Mirgorodskiy <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623. Message-ID: <4973597.pFY2WkjzUY@home.alkar.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=UgA4Fk0qxGSJX4GqL3Esvdq%2BebWj6HZu-AfTbTmJw7A@mail.gmail.com> References: <51702dc6.87ee440a.57aa.327e@mx.google.com> <2271040.usaorIa3D6@home.alkar.net> <CAJ-Vmo=UgA4Fk0qxGSJX4GqL3Esvdq%2BebWj6HZu-AfTbTmJw7A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, HEAD everything else except the wifi code (ath). Last working revision is 247286. So problem in revision 247287. On Thursday 18 April 2013 10:42:15 Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hm, so -HEAD everything else except the wifi code? > > That's really odd. I updated to -HEAD this morning just to test the > AR9287 for you and it was peachy! > > > Adrian > > On 18 April 2013 10:36, Artyom Mirgorodskiy > <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes > > > > > > > > On Thursday 18 April 2013 10:30:33 Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > On head? > > > > > > > > Adrian > > > > > > > > Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Artyom MirgorodskiyOn Apr 18, 2013 10:06 AM, <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > I tried to check out revision 245031 (only sys/dev/ath) and got a working > > WiFi. I'll try to find a broken revision. > > > > > > > > On Thursday 18 April 2013 11:37:17 John Baldwin wrote: > > > >> On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > >> > Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? > > > >> > > > >> Only that this means absolutely nothing? These are the values the BIOS > >> wrote > > > >> into the registers which we use as hints about whether or not ACPI lies > >> about > > > >> which interrupts are used when APIC is disabled. The actually useful > >> message > > > >> shows the same interrupts used in both cases: > > > >> > > > >> > HEAD: > > > >> > > > > >> > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18 > > > >> > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on > >> > pci10 > > > >> > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60 > > > >> > > > > >> > versus > > > >> > > > > >> > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18 > > > >> > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on > >> > pci10 > > > >> > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60 > > > >> > > > >> > > > > -- > > > > Artyom Mirgorodskiy > > > > > > -- > > > > Artyom Mirgorodskiy -- Artyom Mirgorodskiy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4973597.pFY2WkjzUY>