Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 May 2014 08:07:47 +0400
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r266544 - head/sys/dev/iwn
Message-ID:  <20140523040747.GH50679@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140523040658.GG50679@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201405221456.s4MEuYkb095774@svn.freebsd.org> <20140523040658.GG50679@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:06:58AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:56:34PM +0000, Edward Tomasz Napierala wrote:
T> E> Author: trasz
T> E> Date: Thu May 22 14:56:34 2014
T> E> New Revision: 266544
T> E> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266544
T> E> 
T> E> Log:
T> E>   Make iwn(4) able to get itself back into working condition after
T> E>   "fatal firmware error" happens.  Previously it was neccessary to reset
T> E>   it manually, using "/etc/rc.d/netif restart".
T> 
T> Do we really need a full kernel thread for that task?
T> 
T> Why not to use taskqueue(9) task and post it to standard thread taskqueue?

Nice :) Your next commit does that :)

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140523040747.GH50679>