Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:32:46 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: threads@freebsd.org, standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: <pthread.h>/2 Message-ID: <20050819213244.GH77069@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0508191642410.12955-100000@sea.ntplx.net> References: <20050819203807.GG77069@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0508191642410.12955-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:12:48PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:42:34PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > > > > > > any objections to this patch? It moves the identifiers starting with > > > > MUTEX_ into the BSD namespace. > > > > > > Looks fine to me. I don't even think we should have MUTEX_* > > > around anyways. > > > > But we had those names for quite a while and maybe there are > > applications using them, that's why I provided the compatibility macros. > > Yes, but you wouldn't break ABI by removing them (I'd advocate > doing this in -current). Okay, gone it is ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050819213244.GH77069>