Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 03:15:59 +0200 From: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org> To: gnn@FreeBSD.org Cc: performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing... Message-ID: <01F3BA1C-C7C6-41C7-AFE8-675FA972D1A3@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <m2hde3b3k8.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> References: <m2hde3b3k8.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:25 PM, gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > I plan to make a port of this this weekend, but would like some > feedback on this set of benchmarks. If they're useful I think we > should make them part of a nightly benchmarking strategy. In case you're interested, I ran it on a dual p4 xeon (without HyperThreading) from the netperf cluster, to compare the performance of RELENG_5, RELENG_6 and HEAD. You can find the results at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/stuff/ compare_tiger-3.html . It shows that RELENG_6 and HEAD are (in these tests) almost never slower than RELENG_5, and often more than 20% faster. -- Suleiman Souhlal | ssouhlal@vt.edu The FreeBSD Project | ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01F3BA1C-C7C6-41C7-AFE8-675FA972D1A3>