Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 21:08:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@tormail.org> Cc: gecko@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: seamonkey-2.16.1 failed on i386 8 Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1304012052440.4333@tuna.site> In-Reply-To: <1UMftu-0008PT-2L@internal.tormail.org> References: <201303311924.r2VJOTnP095849@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <E2CFA713-F7A0-4648-AF94-7CA7ECEF9B16@freebsd.org> <1UMftu-0008PT-2L@internal.tormail.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Jan Beich wrote: >>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/a.8.20130331051500.pointyhat/seamonkey-2.16.1.log So, I studied this log and www/seamonkey/Makefile, and what I do not see is where the following dependencies are coming from? >> ===> seamonkey-2.16.1 depends on executable: gmake - found >> ===> seamonkey-2.16.1 depends on executable: gcc46 - not found Neither USE_GMAKE nor USE_GCC are set by this port. So, how are these two triggered? I see one instances of USE_GCC in firefox/Makefile, but only under option PGO which does not look like it's on by default? > Likely a regression caused by recent bsd.gcc.mk changes. bsd.gecko.mk > where USE_GCC=yes is defined hasn't changed since 2013-02-24. I cannot exclude this, though to me it appears the answer to "Why is GCC being detected as a missing dependency later in the game, but not up front?" seems to be crucial. What makes me very suspicious is this: ports.svn/www/seamonkey> make test-gcc make: don't know how to make test-gcc. Stop This indicates that Mk/bsd.gcc.mk is _not_ included properly! Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1304012052440.4333>