Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:06:54 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: jose@we.lc.ehu.es Subject: Re: CVSup slower than rsync ? Message-ID: <p05200f38ba5f41a84d43@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <200301301725.h0UHPCW6072092@vashon.polstra.com> References: <20030130104856.GC246@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es> <200301301725.h0UHPCW6072092@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:25 AM -0800 1/30/03, John Polstra wrote:
>
>The first update will naturally be slower, because CVSup has to
>figure out what you already have and create its status files.
>Subsequent updates should go faster.
>
>Also, it should help a lot if you add "-s" to the cvsup command
>line.
I was wondering if cvsup-mirror should do something like add two
crontab entries, one with -s and one without, or maybe add a
if [ `date +%H` -gt 07 ] ; then
options="${options} -s"
fi
to the update script, so -s is used most of the time, but there's
still the full-checking done at least once a day. I imagine the
two crontab entries would be more visible and thus better, but at
the moment I've just added the if statement to the update script.
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05200f38ba5f41a84d43>