Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 16:49:53 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed change to sbuf semantics Message-ID: <200101272349.f0RNnrO31566@aslan.scsiguy.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "28 Jan 2001 00:06:37 %2B0100." <xzpwvbgppc2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> In otherwords, I'd like to be able to test if an >> sbuf has been written to before it has been finalized >> so you can do things like: > >Well, you can use sbuf_len() for that. It returns 0 if the sbuf is >empty, -1 if it overflowed, and the length of its contents otherwise. I thought that sbuf_len() required a finalized buffer. Did you change this in your patches? -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101272349.f0RNnrO31566>