Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 07:28:55 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) To: michaelh@cet.co.jp Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Iozone: local vs nfs drives Message-ID: <199610181428.HAA18892@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.93.961018112301.29655B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> (message from Michael Hancock on Fri, 18 Oct 1996 11:25:31 %2B0900 (JST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > I haven't seen tagged-queueing make much difference for reads. These
* > are the kind of numbers we've seen before (off the top of my head):
* >
* > w/o tag with tag
* > W R W R
* > Quantum Atlas 6 7 6 7
* > Seagate 'Cuda 4 6 6 7
*
* I guess we haven't addressed the original question though. It's strange,
You're right, I've never seen any drive that can write faster than
reading. At least in my limited experience with, um, 5 drives and two
controllers.
Satoshi
P.S. Here's another one, this is IDE (P5-133, ST32140A):
## iozone 100 65536
:
3236501 bytes/second for writing the file
3689327 bytes/second for reading the file
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610181428.HAA18892>