Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:22:04 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Mark <offworld@richnet.net> Cc: "freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Is BSD capable?? Message-ID: <20010423212204.B32567@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <002001c0cc6d$be9aee20$8995efd1@quick>; from offworld@richnet.net on Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:22:06PM -0400 References: <002001c0cc6d$be9aee20$8995efd1@quick>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:22:06PM -0400, Mark wrote: > Is BSD capable of taking 2 half duplex NICs like with a coax (BNC) cabled > network and having them work "send only" and "receive only" to form a full > duplex link? For that matter, is any of the *nux OS's capable of doing th= is? > Or Cisco for that matter. I have a project that needs this type of soluti= on, > making a full duplex network out of 2 half duplex devices. Any hope for m= e? > Just a man or howto would be more than enough. Full duplex communication on coax (a shared medium) isn't even a valid concept. If you're talking no one else can be, there's literaly only one wire. What do you actually want to do here? -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE65P9rXY6L6fI4GtQRAvHXAJoDOMZv2GszlR2Lh+voz3LpBYK6+gCfXE3t TmflmWq1IkgFyJ2eJbUmnzg= =Xwg6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010423212204.B32567>