Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Aug 1996 20:42:08 +0300 (EET DST)
From:      Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To:        Robert Nordier <rnordier@iafrica.com>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org, terry@lambert.org, ache@nagual.ru
Subject:   Re: anyone working on upgrading the msdosfs to NetBSD levels?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960801203259.17950B-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
In-Reply-To: <199608011706.TAA00498@eac.iafrica.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, 1 Aug 1996, Robert Nordier wrote:

> > > AFAIK, DOS filenames containing characters >= 0x80 have never been
> > > much used, or had much practical value.  So extensive special
> > > provision for them almost seems misplaced.
> 
> Sander wrote:
> 
> > Actually they have at least around here. People just like to have 
> > filenames with all those a", o", u" and even o~ (although that is one 
> > which indeed does make troubles). Nothing ever happened except that nczip 
> > refuses to pack them up.
> 
> and Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> 
> > It isn't true, nationalized Win95 versions actively use it.
> > F.e. Win95 Russian Edition use Russian (CP866) names
> > for many folders/files.
> > There is yet one interesting thing: DOS national charset
> > used, not Windows one. For Russian Windows charset (CP1251)
> > is different with DOS one (CP866). So Win95 does special efforts
> > to convert between charsets.
> 
> Thanks for this feedback.  I was evidently completely wrong on this
> issue. 

You were right within a context. That's what the lists are for.

	Sander

> 
> -- 
> Robert Nordier
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960801203259.17950B-100000>