Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:03:28 -0800 From: Jay Chandler <lists@sequestered.net> To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap -- update claims "up to date" but it's not. Message-ID: <4771E0A0.60008@sequestered.net> In-Reply-To: <20071225234859.F75015@prime.gushi.org> References: <20071225234859.F75015@prime.gushi.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > Maybe I'm just doing this completely wrong: > > prime# portsnap update > Ports tree is already up to date. > prime# portsnap fetch > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done. > Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > Updating from Mon Nov 12 18:16:16 EST 2007 to Tue Dec 25 21:36:54 EST > 2007. > Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. > Applying metadata patches... done. > Fetching 4 metadata files... > [and so on] > > Am I using this thing wrong? > > -Dan Yup. 'portsnap fetch update' is the command I use-- the reverse order that you're using 'em in. -- Jay Chandler / KB1JWQ Living Legend / Systems Exorcist Today's Excuse: no "any" key on keyboard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4771E0A0.60008>