Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 11:23:52 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: mikebo@tellabs.com Cc: bugs@freebsd.org, mikebo@freefall.freebsd.org (Mike Borowiec) Subject: Re: 2.0.5R: Is there a BUG in "ar"? -RESENT- Message-ID: <199509201723.LAA27860@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199509201633.LAA02014@sunc210.tellabs.com> References: <199509201633.LAA02014@sunc210.tellabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Ummm... excuse me, but is someone responsible for tracking and > acknowledging submissions to the "bugs" list, or is this simply > a BLACK-HOLE? I fail to see how the "bugs" list can be effective > if its subscribers only pick-up and/or acknowledge "interesting" > or "critical" problems. Sorry about that, our bug tracking software (GNATS) went down for a little while, but is back up now. > I'm re-submitting my "bug" in the hopes that someone will at least > look at it... It's been looked at, and Bruce Evans submitted a fix for it and it's in the tree. --------- revision 1.6 date: 1995/09/18 18:37:09; author: bde; state: Exp; lines: +2 -7 Back out the change in rev.1.4 and fix the formatting of the change in rev.1.3. 1.4 just broke 1.3 for the -x case. This fixes PR 721 and merges archive.c with 4.4Lite2. --------- Thanks for keeping us honest, and I'm sorry no one responded to your bug report. In the future, if you could submit them using 'send-pr' it would be easier for us. Also, when someone analyzed/fixed the bug you would be sent a response to show you the status of your bug report. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509201723.LAA27860>