Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 15:36:56 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cd9660 w/ Joliet extensions Message-ID: <199705232236.PAA07974@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <19970523224300.LX25394@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at May 23, 97 10:43:00 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > This is probably a bit premature, but is anyone working on support for > > Microsoft's Joliet cd9660 extensions? > > I would prefer mickeysoft using RR. :-] If you have the MSDN level II or better ddk, you have the Joliet spen in your "DDK\DOCS" directory. The Joliet spec. supports, among other things, Unicode file names for long file names. In this respect, it is vastly superior to RR. It is also upwardly compatible with RR, so it will interoperate, though it does handle multisession rather well compared to the non-Joliet formats, including automatic identification of data sessions, etc. ...something FreeBSD currently has problems with. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705232236.PAA07974>