Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:06:50 -0400 From: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 9504 for review Message-ID: <20020410110650.C209@locore.ca> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20020410090618.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@freebsd.org on Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:06:18AM -0400 References: <200204101152.g3ABqYV54915@freefall.freebsd.org> <XFMail.20020410090618.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Apparently, On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:06:18AM -0400, John Baldwin said words to the effect of; > > On 10-Apr-2002 Peter Wemm wrote: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/p4db/chv.cgi?CH=9504 > > > > Change 9504 by peter@peter_thunder on 2002/04/10 04:51:36 > > > > Use dfr's fix instead of my hack. I expect he'll commit this to > > freefall soon. :-) > > Yep, much better. :) Well, now the flag checking code is duplicated in both the trap and syscall return paths, alpha is the same. One wonders if the FRAME_SYSCALL optimization is actually worth all this complication. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020410110650.C209>