Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:07:02 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for review: build infrastructure for Clang Message-ID: <4BF1BE06.3050008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201005180000.08299.max@love2party.net> References: <20100514152408.GN56080@hoeg.nl> <20100517092628.GC56080@hoeg.nl> <4BF1B352.4030306@FreeBSD.org> <201005180000.08299.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/17/10 15:00, Max Laier wrote:
> On Monday 17 May 2010 23:21:22 Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 05/17/10 02:26, Ed Schouten wrote:
>>> * Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> lib/clang/..., as it is done for bind ?
>>>
>>> So I guess that would lead to the following directory structure?
>>>
>>> - lib/clang/libclang.../
>>> - lib/clang/libllvm.../
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> - usr.bin/clang/clang/
>>> - usr.bin/clang/tblgen/
>>
>> I don't think we have any hierarchies like this in the tree currently.
>
> we do - e.g. usr.bin/bsdiff/{bsdiff,bspatch} and usr.sbin/acpi/* I can see
> that the latter makes sense, but the former doesn't make immediate sense to
> me. From my POV clang is more like acpi in this regard - at least for the
> moment.
Sorry I wasn't clear ... there are a few hierarchies for things that
share common code (add usr.sbin/pkg_install to the list) but I didn't
think that was the case here. If I'm wrong, sorry for the misinformation.
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BF1BE06.3050008>