Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Nov 1998 17:27:15 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: splashkit current status? 
Message-ID:  <199811110127.RAA02013@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:23:49 PST." <Pine.BSF.4.03.9811101608580.11516-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, 10 Nov 1998, Mike Smith wrote:
> 
> > > The topic of the splashkit came up today and I'm curious to know what it's
> > > current status is.  I see a commit to syscons in early August about it but
> > > the only patches available otherwise are from February.  And is the 2.2.x
> > > patch any good?
> > > 
> > > Could you shed some light, Mike? :-)
> > 
> > I played with it again a little bit the other night. 
> > 
> > The basic problems with the splashkit as it stands for 2.2.x are that 
> > it's really limited to 320x200x8bpp or 640x480x4bpp, and it requires 
> > some quite ugly hackery to the kernel and bootblocks.
> 
> That's okay, 2.2.x isn't the target.  I was particuarly interested in
> knowing if the 1998020X bundle that the Project page points to is up to
> date.  

It's "up to date" for when it was released, sure.  It's by no means "up 
to date" for -current.  Doing splash things is easier in -current now 
we have the VESA infrastructure in place, but there's nothing actually 
happening there at the moment.

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811110127.RAA02013>