Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:33:44 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade - mystery dependencies to imake? Message-ID: <20011203223344.C28651@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <86vgfo42so.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>; from knu@idaemons.org on Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 02:43:51AM %2B0900 References: <15371.45182.662587.797881@chlx169.ch.intel.com> <86vgfo42so.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 02:43:51AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > I personally believe that the XFree86-4 port should immediately be > changed to a meta port of those reasonably and conveniently divided > XFree86-4-* ports, but the maintainers do not seem to feel like doing > it somehow. ;) At least it should be made that way before the release in which XFree86-4 is made the default, I think. I hope that's not in the upcoming 4.5? What's holding this all up by the way? Is making a correct meta-port difficult, or is something else the problem? --Stijn -- Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011203223344.C28651>