Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:27:20 -0400
From:      Paul <paul@gtcomm.net>
To:        Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>
Cc:        rwatson@freebsd.org, Ali Niknam <freebsd-net@transip.nl>, net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 7.0: sockets stuck in CLOSED state...
Message-ID:  <48653108.4080806@gtcomm.net>
In-Reply-To: <cApEDKk3Lgor00nO3MwN6FQbgGQ@ueg2etH2tHnUpbLg646csVJgCAY>
References:  <486283B0.3060805@transip.nl> <5A9ZR/wNTIFIXEvIi7qXj2foxBI@/2P5JkFFETcbMzHSQ1hIkFGHokc> <48648D70.50304@transip.nl> <c9uXVuSzhJDd2VY%2Bhw9uuGe5NAg@3xQSkDAynh8xLl8Q/P9pjshN3Fo> <4864E0FE.40708@gtcomm.net> <cApEDKk3Lgor00nO3MwN6FQbgGQ@ueg2etH2tHnUpbLg646csVJgCAY>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Eygene.. It happens with telnet :)  A lot of my closed entries are 
from telnet so I can't really put a finger on any specific application :/


Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Paul, good day.
>
> Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 08:45:50AM -0400, Paul wrote:
>   
>> I have the same 'problem' if that helps any.. Sockets stuck for over a 
>> month in CLOSED and they have a * for the port on the source IP.
>> tcp4       0      0  67.1.1.1.*         67.1.1.2.1261       CLOSED
>> 7.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p1 #6: Thu Apr 17 18:11:49 EDT 2008   
>> amd64
>> Doesn't seem to cause any issues though.
>>     
>
> And what is listening to that port?  Can you identify the application?
> Just for the record -- may be it will narrow down the search list.
>
> Robert Watson told us today at the morning that he spotted the bug
> that lead to the '*' instead of port number.  Robert, can you post
> the patch -- it seems to be not yet committed, at least cvs-src
> list has no signs of it?
>
> By the way, is the patch touches in_pcbdrop() in /sys/netinet/in_pcb.c,
> removing instruction 'inp->inp_lport = 0;'?
>   




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48653108.4080806>