Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:21:24 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> Cc: lars.engels@0x20.net, xavier@groumpf.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg : option to exclude some files from checksum ? Message-ID: <20151102232124.GB31432@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <201511022319.tA2NJFkA065608@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <20151102082943.GF66179@e-new.0x20.net> <201511022319.tA2NJFkA065608@gw.catspoiler.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 03:19:15PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: > On 2 Nov, Lars Engels wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:35:10AM +0100, Xavier wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >>=20 > >> I noticed that some ports are complaining in daily check that a checks= um=20 > >> has changed. > >>=20 > >> Example : f-prot which checksums virus definitions, which obviously ch= anges. > >>=20 > >> Is there some macro/option in Makefile to not checksum this file ? > >>=20 > >> I hope my point is clear enough... > >>=20 > >> TIA, > >>=20 > >> Xav > >=20 > > make -DNO_CHECKSUM should work >=20 > Does it make sense to include stale virus definitions in the package? > Why not just download the up to date definitions at runtime? >=20 I agree that is what the port should do Bapt --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlY37/QACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwNQQCgvx0gUSgG7kDbagPSzQeaYpzg fUMAoKMt+X/9fsmDHjSruRt40/VnRyjy =MMd9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151102232124.GB31432>