Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 19:17:34 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Johann Visagie <wjv@FreeBSD.org> Cc: kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, petef@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USE_LIBTOOL breakage in freebsd.port.mk Message-ID: <3BC1D19E.6893A69E@FreeBSD.org> References: <7m1ykhl40i.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <200110060717.KAA02458@ipcard.iptcom.net> <20011008102744.B7417@fling.sanbi.ac.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Johann Visagie wrote: > Maxim Sobolev on 2001-10-06 (Sat) at 10:17:25 +0300: > > > > Please don't do that. Due to number of ports infected with > > USE_LIBTOOL this patch should be extensively tested on the > > bento first. > > Pardon my ignorance, but what is the procedure to ensure that something like > this does get extensively tested on bento, and not just forgotten about. By > now I've received a number of reports about ports affected by this problem. send-pr(1) (assign it to portmgr@) > > In the meantime you can workarround the problem by replacing > > USE_LIBTOOL with GNU_CONFIGURE and adding a small patch, which > > prevents .la files from being installed (for example see > > ports/textproc/libxml/files/patch-ltmain.sh). > > I'll do that for the moment - thanks! No problems. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BC1D19E.6893A69E>