Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 09:49:42 +1100 (EST) From: David Dawes <dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> To: lehey.pad@sni.de (Greg Lehey) Cc: erich@lodgenet.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: using ddb to debug a double-panic? Message-ID: <199603132249.JAA06168@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199603131703.SAA19490@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de> from "Greg Lehey" at Mar 13, 96 05:59:42 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> Seriously, Bruce (or anybody else): what kind of editing? The main >>>>> objection I have to vi-style editing in shells is that it is so >>>>> ESC-intensive. I suspect it's also more difficult to program, though >>>>> I don't suppose that's the real problem. If anybody has any >>>>> alternatives to emacs-style bindings, please let me know a detailed >>>>> description of how it should work. >> >> I'm definitly in favor of emacs-bindings, even the vi lovers here >> hate the vi-mode in ksh,bash,... > >Noted. I suppose we'll find out if anybody disagrees with you :-) I disagree (someone has to :-). I always use vi mode in tcsh. My fingers are definitely wired for vi. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603132249.JAA06168>