Date: 18 Nov 1998 15:44:25 -0600 From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: Vadim Kolontsov <vadim@tversu.ru> Cc: Mikael Karpberg <karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, William McVey <wam@sa.fedex.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Would this make FreeBSD more secure? Message-ID: <864srwisli.fsf@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: Vadim Kolontsov's message of "Thu, 19 Nov 1998 00:09:14 %2B0300" References: <199811172058.VAA02065@ocean.campus.luth.se> <86hfvwixby.fsf@detlev.UUCP> <19981119000914.A11045@tversu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Another point is that this could be easily augmented to handle other >> authentication methods. For example, OTPs, hand scanners, physical >> keys, etc could all be handled by this one utility instead of having >> to write it into each and every program that needs a password. >> (Something keeps popping into my head talking about Kerberos, but I >> don't know why.) > I wonder how many people would like to see PAM support in FreeBSD?.. Hmm... Methinks you aren't talking about the cooking spray (although I am working on a kitchen computer... maybe add a few robotics... hmm...) :-) Happy hacking, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864srwisli.fsf>