Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 12:00:13 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: downgrade to stable? Message-ID: <20001007120013.C73312@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200010071804.MAA01379@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:04:15PM -0600 References: <20001007125007.B244@tori.mini.net> <200010071804.MAA01379@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:04:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> and then looking for libraries that are too new.
Would one not want to keep the libraries that are too new for things in
/usr/local that would need them. Since the shlib symlink will be for the
"older" lib, there really isn't any problem having too new ones present.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Gnu is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001007120013.C73312>