Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:16:49 +0300 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: idle priority > 30 in top(1) and idprio > 31 Message-ID: <867hf9ashq.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is the following a regression?
$ uname -vm
FreeBSD 9.0-HEAD-20101216-JPSNAP #0: Thu Dec 16 07:13:24 UTC 2010
root@build-amd64-fbsd.allbsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
$ yes >/dev/null &
$ idprio 31 -$(pgrep yes)
$ top
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND
2139 luser 1 117 i-23 10052K 1128K RUN 0:41 98.97% yes
$ idprio 444 -$(pgrep yes)
$ top
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND
2139 luser 1 117 i-102 10052K 1128K RUN 0:42 97.56% yes
On 8.0-RELEASE it's different
$ yes >/dev/null &
$ idprio 31 -$(pgrep yes)
$ top
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND
2653 luser 1 171 i31 5808K 596K RUN 0:10 97.88% yes
$ idprio 444 -$(pgrep yes)
idprio: idprio: Invalid argument
- 8.1-RELEASE accepts idprio > 31, e.g. 444.
- 8.2-BETA1 shows negative values in top(1) like -CURRENT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867hf9ashq.fsf>