Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 22:06:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LDTs Message-ID: <15091.24637.184377.619873@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010504185251.18223A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105042142550.60132-100000@besplex.bde.org> <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010504185251.18223A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen writes: > > OK, thanks. Here's my guess at what should be changed for the Linux > emulator. If this looks correct, I'll commit it. > > Hmm, I wonder how linuxthreads works under FreeBSD without this > change... > Well, they've never worked perfectly, by any means. Perhaps this will improve the stability problems people have been reporting with the various linux jdks under FreeBSD/i386. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15091.24637.184377.619873>