Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 22:57:44 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols Message-ID: <3EB8A058.E3F1D452@mindspring.com> References: <20030501191027.GA53801@madman.celabo.org> <20030505110601.H53365@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030505175426.GA19352@madman.celabo.org> <xzpk7d53zu5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030505205051.GA40572@nagual.pp.ru> <20030505231135.GA21953@madman.celabo.org> <20030505231837.GA44533@nagual.pp.ru> <20030506170823.GI83663@lucky.net> <xzpllxkez78.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <xzp8ytjgbq4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > > There is no problem. Each *.h function prototype can be accompanied with > > some assembler instruction making it strong reference. The same thing can > > be conditionalized at the header level using _POSIX_SOURCE or other > > defines. So, linker will know, what headers are included. > > I would like to draw your attention to points b) and c) above and ask > how you plan to address them. Forget that, I want to see his "make it a strong reference in the header file for multiple object files in the same binary"-foo! -- Terry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EB8A058.E3F1D452>