Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 07:42:43 -0600 From: Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> Subject: Re: jail configuration Message-ID: <52370AD3.2060909@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <86k3igki36.fsf@nine.des.no> References: <8661u2kppt.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130916130543.GA73887@zxy.spb.ru> <86k3igki36.fsf@nine.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/16/13 07:32, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> writes: >> This break existing configuration, yes? > > Yes. > >> Can you adding (not replace) new way? > > Did you look at the patch? The old script is a monster. It would > probably be easier to write a script that generates jail.conf from an > existing old-style configuration. Another option would be to keep the old script if jails are enabled but jail.conf doesn't exist. It seems cleaner in the long run to offer a script to convert rc options to a jail.conf file, run as part of mergemaster. I just worry about POLA. Yes, I've let jail startup go for too long - I really meant to put it in for 10.0 but the recent slush kind of surprised me (which means I'm just not keeping up). After 10 splits off, it's time to just do it. - Jamie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52370AD3.2060909>