Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:03:34 -0500 From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz>, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org>, "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r291741 - head/sys/geom Message-ID: <C8373155-B4D0-4E30-80AF-D190F8CA1E1C@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20151205031713.T3286@besplex.bde.org> References: <201512040338.tB43cZY1053263@repo.freebsd.org> <56610B6B.8010708@FreeBSD.org> <20151204233052.J2220@besplex.bde.org> <20151204125355.6712d782@bender> <20151205031713.T3286@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Il giorno 04/dic/2015, alle ore 13:03, Bruce Evans = <brde@optusnet.com.au> ha scritto: >=20 > On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Andrew Turner wrote: >=20 >> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 23:42:51 +1100 (EST) >> Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> wrote: >> ... >>> This looks like 5 style bugs and 0 issues: >>>=20 >>> 3 old style bugs: >>> - use of bool >>=20 >> I don't seem to see where in style(9) we disallow the use of bool. = Can >> you point me where this is specified? >=20 > This is specified by not giving an example of using it. style(9) was > mostly written 10+ years before bool existed, and bool is so > (un)important that style(9) wasn't changed to allow it in its 16+ > years of existence. >=20 We had this discussion before for ddb: bool won (I think). Pedro.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C8373155-B4D0-4E30-80AF-D190F8CA1E1C>