Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:51:04 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WEIRD: telnet Message-ID: <973616252.20050213175104@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <20050213162308.GA95890@lucky.net> References: <20050213145302.14A9E4BDAA@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> <1736042877.20050213155911@wanadoo.fr> <420F6BAF.8060304@makeworld.com> <1374659210.20050213161054@wanadoo.fr> <420F6ED9.8010301@makeworld.com> <285864121.20050213161830@wanadoo.fr> <420F70C5.60006@makeworld.com> <854574739.20050213163818@wanadoo.fr> <20050213162308.GA95890@lucky.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Valentin Nechayev writes: > If I show screenshot with ssh'ing to port 443, will it be convincing? Yes. I'd like to see how it's done, if it can be done, although I'm still now sure how it would be useful. But I'd rather see it used to connect to ports like 25 or 80. > Not current telnet, because it interprets 0xFF in wrong way. See bin/52032 I dunno. Works for me. Of course, all I ever do with it is check to see if sendmail or my Web server is answering, so it's not a long exchange. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?973616252.20050213175104>