Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 May 1999 10:18:23 +0100 (BST)
From:      Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
To:        CyberPsychotic <fygrave@tigerteam.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, tech@openbsd.org
Subject:   Re: io ports reading/writing
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051016150.411-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9905051359030.632-100000@kyrnet.kg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 5 May 1999, CyberPsychotic wrote:

> ~ 
> ~ The access control for io ports is controlled by the file-system
> ~ permissions on /dev/io. In a standard setup, only root can access this
> ~ device.
> ~ 
> 
>  yes. But I was refering to linux scheme, where you can set the port-range,
> so the code wouldn't make any unintentional damage. (like if you're working
> with cmos you could only permit 0x70/0x71 ports, so even if code goes nuts,
> your disks will be safe). This is basically programmer's problem of course,
> but the feature is very handy.

I don't quite understand the i386 architecture at this level but I seem to
remember that this support would require significant changes in the way we
handle processes and there might have been some performance implications.
I don't think its a big problem in practice.

--
Doug Rabson				Mail:  dfr@nlsystems.com
Nonlinear Systems Ltd.			Phone: +44 181 442 9037




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051016150.411-100000>