Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:19:27 -0400
From:      Garrett Heaver <garrett@caiman.ie>
To:        Denny Lin <dennylin93@hs.ntnu.edu.tw>
Cc:        Johan Hendriks <Johan@double-l.nl>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Port: dovecot-1.2.14
Message-ID:  <9EDE36EB-F1E6-4685-947E-CC4964F30682@caiman.ie>
In-Reply-To: <20100928105437.GI79461@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw>
References:  <6F39BA7E-57DD-4806-9D23-EB8D20B5924F@caiman.ie> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCBDD2BC4@w2003s01.double-l.local> <20100928105437.GI79461@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Postfix uses that standard anyways Denny. postfix is at 2.7 presently =
with postfix24, postfix25, etc being alternatives to track.

On 28 Sep 2010, at 06:54, Denny Lin wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:52:51AM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote:
>>> I was just wondering if there is a port for dovecot 2 in the works
>> already or if I could be any assistance in getting it up and =
>running?
>>=20
>>=20
>> Check out these URL's=20
>>=20
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/150789
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/150790
>>=20
>> This is no guaranty that it will work, you could however start =
testing.
>=20
> I am wondering whether there is an established convention about port
> names and versions since Dovecot 2.0 is now the newest stable branch.
>=20
> Will mail/dovecot be updated to 2.0 and 1.2 moved to mail/dovecot12 or
> will a new port be added for 2.0?
>=20
> --=20
> Denny Lin




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9EDE36EB-F1E6-4685-947E-CC4964F30682>