Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 18:08:31 +0000 (UTC) From: othermark <atkin901@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stable libmilter leaks kqueue descriptors? Message-ID: <slrnbj7ppq.5pb.atkin901@adkinson245.f5net.com> References: <slrnbidfm6.11jf.atkin901@adkinson245.f5net.com> <slrnbifq2n.13vk.atkin901@adkinson245.f5net.com> <20030808133657.GA42855@curry.mchp.siemens.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm glad I'm not 'seeing' things. If you have a good enough idea of where the leakage is occuring, could you file a PR against -STABLE? I'd like to see this fixed soon. I'm not even sure that the pr I referenced is the exact problem, but seems likely. In article <20030808133657.GA42855@curry.mchp.siemens.de>, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > I have a self-written milter app. Today I upgraded to the recent > -STABLE and now it eats KQUEUE filedscriptors like crazy. I tried > to MFC the fix in lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_kqueue.c but I always > get complaints about multiple definition of `_kqueue': > > building shared library libc_r.so.4 > kqueue.So: In function `_kqueue': > kqueue.So(.text+0x14): multiple definition of `_kqueue' > uthread_kqueue.So(.text+0x0): first defined here > *** Error code 1 > > Seems it conflicts with /usr/obj/lib/libc_r/kqueue.S > which is generated everytime from scratch during the build. > > I assume that I have to add kqueue.o to HIDDEN_SYSCALLS > but I am not sure if this is correct and what it will break :-) --- Mark atkin901 at NOSPAM yahoo dot com (!wired)?(coffee++):(wired);
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnbj7ppq.5pb.atkin901>