Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 17:27:22 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Cc: terry@lambert.org, jfieber@indiana.edu, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, langfod@dihelix.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cool Web page interface to mail + search engine? Message-ID: <199703260027.RAA26438@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199703252320.PAA14365@rah.star-gate.com> from "Amancio Hasty" at Mar 25, 97 03:20:14 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> BTW: Your so call mail header problems are not that difficult to > tackle if we control the mail header generation within the mailing > list program and tag each mail message with an appropriate header. [ ... ] > > Now the third riddle: > > > > 3) How do you approximate threading, given the above, and the fact > > that you only control the list server, not the clients? I'd be curious how you generate an "In-reply-to:" for a message for which I have not provided an "In-reply-to:" at my user agent when I sent the thing. I don't see how this can be easily resolved without implying trhreading based on receipt ordering (UTC date stamp) and subject. This gives only a single tthread per subject replied this way... Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703260027.RAA26438>