Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:33:16 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Scaling on 6.2-RELEASE? Message-ID: <20070225193316.GD77205@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <cone.1172420214.242114.68971.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <0e2001c7574c$26bc15a0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <cone.1172277148.840621.73625.5001@35st.simplicato.com> <20070224005748.GA25295@xor.obsecurity.org> <cone.1172420214.242114.68971.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:16:54AM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Kris Kennaway writes: >=20 > >Actually it will help the DB side, when you have multiple simultaneous > >transactions - that's the point :) >=20 > A little confused. > Does this mean FreeBSD will split the threads into multiple CPUs? Yes, if you're running a modern version of FreeBSD (not 4.x). > Or you meant the DB will do better because the load from other programs= =20 > will be split across the different CPUs? That will also happen. Kris --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF4eR8Wry0BWjoQKURAuKwAKDNDcYcJkZrKx31DoTasWS4pvLCHACgqQwA jnJPXvNGxtLahwQoLsb+ddY= =XyeT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070225193316.GD77205>