Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 16:58:09 -0800 (PST) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb> To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, terry@lambert.org, jfieber@indiana.edu, langfod@dihelix.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cool Web page interface to mail + search engine? Message-ID: <199703260058.QAA27769@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199703252049.NAA25652@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Mar 25, 97 01:49:11 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > > How can I reply to a message with a date stamp earlier than the > original message? > > It seems to me that threading would be implicit. ordering != threading ordering is less restrictive relationship has anything useful come out of this thread? well, i checked rfc822, 1122 and 1123, Message-ID header is not required. if not presendt, the sendmail on freefall will add it. same is true of the date. (in reality these depend upon the M and D flags for the mailer, but all mailers on freefall have these flags set) regarding the Message-ID header, Bryan Costales writes: "This header must be declared in the configuration file." wonder where this requirement is laid down? jmb
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703260058.QAA27769>