Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:12:18 +0100 From: "OxY" <oxy@field.hu> To: "Chuck Swiger" <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit Message-ID: <000c01c64a95$f7759aa0$0201a8c0@oxy> References: <000a01c64a81$45eb6850$0201a8c0@oxy> <441BF838.1080600@mac.com> <000601c64a87$51d7dee0$0201a8c0@oxy> <441BFF26.90807@mac.com> <000e01c64a8f$1b2bec80$0201a8c0@oxy> <000401c64a91$c3962c30$0201a8c0@oxy> <441C126A.7060109@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
damn! after the apache downloaders came back fully (40-50 download at time /2-4M/s traffic on fxp0) the loss is 5-8% again on em0.. polling is enabled for both interfaces. should i change something related to polling? sysctl vars for example? (i put back everything to default) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Swiger" <cswiger@mac.com> To: "OxY" <oxy@field.hu> Cc: <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 3:00 PM Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit > OxY wrote: >> i increased hz from 2000 to 5000, now the packet loss is decreased >> from 5-6% to 0.6-0,8% !!! >> huge improve! > > Good deal. > >> should i increase hz more? > > Experiment. :-) Keep track of the numbers you get, and post a summary > once > you've had a day or two to shake things down. > > -- > -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000c01c64a95$f7759aa0$0201a8c0>