Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 18:03:19 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum remains broken in 5.3-RELEASE? Message-ID: <418D7457.1040806@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20041107003413.GQ24507@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <200411061126.23666.msch@snafu.de> <20041106152125.GC80167@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200411061803.21539.msch@snafu.de> <20041106173913.GA80837@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20041107003413.GQ24507@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Saturday, 6 November 2004 at 18:39:13 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > >>On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 06:03:20PM +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote.. >> >>>Hello Wilko, >>> >>>Am Samstag, 6. November 2004 16:21 schrieb Wilko Bulte: >>> >>>>On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 11:26:16AM +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette >>>>wrote.. >>>> >>>>>I cannot imagine to deliver/sell CDs with 5.3-RELEASE on it with a >>>>>broken gvinum RAID5 where the fix is available for (roughly) 2 >>>>>weeks now. >>>> >>>>You obviously have NO idea what it means to build releases for >>>>all the architectures etc etc. >>> >>>My apologies if I made you upset... >> >>Oh, not upset. Problem is that there are most likely lots of other >>bugs still in 5.3-R. >> >>Thing is, at some point we just need to call it a day and put the >>generated bits on the ftp-servers. Otherwise there would never >>be a RELEASE.. > > > I can appreciate that the leadup to 5.3-RELEASE has been painful, but > what's the purpose of a release which doesn't work? For a large > number of Vinum users, 5.3 will be a release to avoid. > > Greg > -- > See complete headers for address and phone numbers. Lukas and I discussed this extensively, and the decision was agreed upon. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?418D7457.1040806>