Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 12:53:40 +0800 From: "Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: development of framebuffer driver hi res console Message-ID: <20080523045340.GD40788@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au> In-Reply-To: <1211300383.93737.6.camel@localhost> References: <CBB7AFEE-3E22-4059-8E5E-341BA0B40338@internode.on.net> <20080520074611.GH97796@carrot.home.paeps.cx> <1211300383.93737.6.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
0n Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:19:43AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 09:46 +0200, Philip Paeps wrote:
>> On 2008-05-16 19:15:19 (+0800), ketracel <ketracel@internode.on.net> wrote:
>> > Any FreeBSD developers out there working on a Framebuffer driver which
>> > provides modern high resolution modes (including widescreen) for the system
>> > console?
>>
>> Not specifically working on a high-res framebuffer, but I'm working on
>> divorcing the framebuffer from syscons. Once that work is done, it should be
>> possible to write more "advanced" framebuffer drivers.
>
>And the graphics developers are already porting their drivers to the
>kernel to provide the framebuffer part. What it would take to port that
>to FreeBSD has been outlined elsewhere.
Can someone actually define what is meant as "framebuffer" as opposed to VESA ?
I have physically seen OSs such as gentoo that have a framebuffer (pretty
consoles) but I have never ever known what a "framebuffer" is in the context of
VTYs.
Anyone care to post a nutshell summary ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080523045340.GD40788>